
After the first bombing, 70 000 precious lives were taken, 61 000 were injured and 20 000 of the dead and missing were school children. The outcome of this monster was much more horrifying than what the world has experienced. people in the streets were vaporized, leaving only their imprinted shadows on the walls, they were buried in collapsed buildings, and the Japanese survivors (only 10% of the people who were within 500 meters of the center of the bomb) died soon due to the radiation sickness, gamma rays and cancers. The question is, was it necessary? Was the atomic bomb really necessary for Japan's surrender? I personally think that the atomic bomb was necessary and played a key role in putting an end to World War 2. It is a known fact that the atomic bomb had been a deadly monster to Japan. however, Japan and Nazi Germany's ambition of domination was too strong that it caused the Allied Powers to choose the most drastic and effective way. They were the ones to break the peace in the first place by showing their determination of world conqueration. My second question is, what if the Allied powers had not used the atomic bombs, then what would the outcomes be? how would it have changed the course of the war? I think that the result would have been unbearable to the world because Germany was developing atomic bombs also, which means that if the Allied powers had not used it first and Japan had not surrendered, then the Allied nations would have suffered form what Japan had to go through with atomic bomb attacks. Also, the world would have been dominated and controlled by the Nazis or the fascist groups. some of us would not even exist today if that had happened Therefore, I thin that even though the atomic bomb was a drastic way, it was necessary to defend the Allied nations, crush Germany and Japan's mad ambition and finally put an end to World War 2.
No comments:
Post a Comment