World War 1
The Schlieffen Plan... Was it the best plan for Germany?

Was it really the best plan for the Germans and the others? Personally, I do not think that it was an outstanding plan. Firstly, if Germany did not attack France through Belgium, disregarding its neutrality, then Britain would not have joined the war to protect Belgium. Even though Germany knew that Britain was a strong nation with fine economy, had the strongest naval force and an army that is as powerful as Germany, was the undisputed ruler of the high seas and the controller of a colonial empire that covered on quarter of the earth's land mass, they called in Britain as their enemy. Britain itself was a powerful nation, but it also brought its colonial country, Canada along with it which supported with a large number of volunteers. This resulted a longer and intenser war as the Triple Entente gained more force and support. Secondly, Why didn't the Germans attack Russia first instead of France? Even though the Russian army was large, they were poorly trained and they needed time to equip themselves. If Germany attacked Russia first when it is not ready to fight back and before it gets stronger, wouldn't that have been safer than trapping France and then attacking Russia which requires more time, attraction of the French troops at the border and some luck that Russians would take enough the time to prepare for the war as Germans attack France?
Question: What would have changed if the German army did not attack France through Belgium or attacked Russia first?
No comments:
Post a Comment